Preregistration
Transparent Processes and Research Design
Data Management
Analytical Tools
Data Storage and Sharing
Preprint Servers
Open Access Publications
Other awesome things to help good quality research, dissemination
Many scholars think Open Science means open data, and precisely for this reason, it is less applicable and less feasible for qualitative research. Transparent research practices are more than considering making your data public. Below are some ideas on what you can share with others:
- Conceptualization (key terms and their descriptions/definitions, theoretical framework, etc.)
- Research design/Operationalization (research questions and type of measurement, sampling strategy, sample size planning, recruitment, etc.)
- Process of data collection (tools: interview guide, observation guide, etc., stopping criteria, type of data collected)
- Codes (code development, different versions of code structure and round/s of triangulation, final codebook, etc.)
- Segmentation and data transformation (if qual data was segmented what considerations were behind that, how was it achieved, etc.)
- Coding process (changes in codes while coding: merges, splits, additions, etc., software used, number of raters, inter-rater reliability measures, etc.)
- Analysis (analytical approach, analytical tools, analysis scripts, etc.)
- Credibility strategies (respondent validation, peer debriefing, etc.)
- If you are using Epistemic Network Analysis: model parameters: unit, conversation, stanza window, SVD/means rotation, edge weights, etc.
...And not merely stating the decisions you have made in your process, but also the justifications and reasoning behind these decisions. Making these aspects of qualitative research public not only increases the transparency and confirmability of a project, but also helps other researchers make better decisions. Sharing our challenges and decision processes adds to a pool of knowledge that will advance science in general.